Skip to content

Conversation

kirschbombe
Copy link
Contributor

@kirschbombe kirschbombe commented Jan 28, 2022

Preview: https://preview.iiif.io/api/annex-migration-services/registry/services/

This draft PR is the start of migrating the annex/services content to registry/services. So far this:

Some questions/comments:

  • do we want to have columns for presi 2 and 3 in the table?
  • migrating physdim from annex to registry changes the context path. For now, I updated the paths in the migrated text and made a copy of the physdim folder which I placed in the "registry/services" folder, leaving the original in "annex/services" folder as well
  • physdim has a note about adding a confidence label - is that something to discuss?
  • Editor's agreed that it would be good for physdim to get TRC review (next deadline in 9th Feb.)
  • I also found this issue discussing physdim as an extension instead of service: Document Physical Dimensions extension #1358

migrate geojson and physdim services from annex to registry
@tomcrane
Copy link
Contributor

Icons in the table could maybe reference https://iiif.io/api/presentation/3.0/#a-summary-of-property-requirements rather than redefine the symbols?

@kirschbombe kirschbombe changed the title Migrate geojson and physdim services from annex to registry Migrate extensions and services from annex to registry Feb 3, 2022
@kirschbombe kirschbombe added this to the Annex & Registry updates milestone Feb 3, 2022
…ty requirements

replace icon definitions with link to icon table in summary of property requirements
migrate openannotation from annex to registry; rename to webannotation

migrate openannotation from annex to registry; rename to webannotation
@glenrobson
Copy link
Member

How do you get to the webannotation registry part? Should it be linked from the api/index.md file?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants